Thematic Panel 5- Care, surveillance and vulnerability: boundaries and limits of care

Convenors- Dr. Zuzana Sekeráková Búriková and Dr. Veronika Valkovičová, Institute for Sociology of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Focusing on the relationship among care, control/surveillance, and vulnerability, the aim of this panel is to examine boundaries of care and control/surveillance.

The ethics of care criticises the separation of control (or violence) and care (Held, 2010; Tronto, 2013, 2020). The practice of care tends to imply vulnerability which is not only based on social positioning or marginality, but tends to be situational and relational, which means being vulnerable to someone, or vulnerability in a certain situation. Caring for the vulnerable is often associated with paternalism (Kittay, 1999; Smiley, 2020), which can spill over to manifestations of violence. Thus, various manifestations of power and control are part of the daily practices associated with intimate or professional care relationships and practices. 

We welcome papers which examine boundaries and limits of care focusing on aspects of care involving control, surveillance, and vulnerability. While we welcome papers from any geographical area, authors from outside of Europe are especially encouraged to apply. 

We are interested in papers:

  • Discussing dynamics of care and control/surveillance from various theoretical perspectives
  • based on empirical cases analysing how control becomes part of care practices and relationships
  • focusing on various tools and technologies used for surveillance in care practices
  • discussing abuse and violence in professional or intimate care settings and relationships.

Thematic Panel 4- Pushing the boundaries of ECEC: New actors, practices, and technologies

Convenor- Aisling Gallagher, Massey University, New Zealand

In the absence of public provision, many governments now rely on the market to meet parental demand for Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), influenced in large part by the neoliberal belief in the benefits of competition and consumer choice. ECEC as a result has become big business in these markets, with heightened involvement from a host of for-profit, private sector actors and groups over the last twenty years. Much research to date has sought to trace out the impacts of marketisation, noting endemic problems such as high costs for parents, varying quality of care and education for children and often poor remuneration and professionalisation for those who work in the sector.  

Building on existing work, this session seeks to explore the changing contours of advanced ECEC markets, noting in particular the involvement of new actors, practices and technologies in the organisation and delivery of marketised ECEC. Possible presentations may include, but are not limited to, the following topics:

  • Processes of corporatisation and financialisation of ECEC, and its impacts on the organisation and delivery of services
  • The integration of technology and software in the management, organisation and delivery of ECCE and its impacts
  • The interconnections of the ECEC sector with the financial, property and/or investment domains 
  • The changing experiences of marketised ECEC for parents, workers and children
  • The involvement of new actors in advocacy and policy decision-making around ECEC markets

Thematic Panel 3- Digital Technologies and Care in Crisis Contexts: Re-drawing Boundaries

Convenors – Kate Hamblin and Grace Whitfield, University of Sheffield

Care systems globally have been described as being ‘in crisis’ as populations age and the supply of care is outstripped by demand. Technology is one of the tools proposed by policymakers as a means to increase workforce capacity, save costs and create positive outcomes for those receiving care and support. In this panel, we would like to invite paper submissions that critically reflect on the role of digital technologies within care systems, provision, arrangements and relationships at various levels: macro (policy); meso (practice) and micro (lived experience). Contributions should reflect on the conferences core themes, for example by considering: 

Technology and boundaries: how does technology mediate or create boundaries in care arrangements? For example, how does it alter, shape or facilitate care across distances or borders? How does technology create new divisions and boundaries for those receiving or providing care and support? 

Technology and transitions: what role does technology play in transitions in care at various levels- for individuals as they move through the lifecourse, or organisations or providers as they shift their practice to accommodate digital technologies and systems? 

Technology and crisis contexts: what role has technology played in care arrangements during crisis contexts such as the COVID-19 pandemic or in periods of conflict? What crises or challenges could the increased use of digital technologies bring to care? For example, related to regulation, skills and job quality? 

Thematic Panel 1 – Family transitions: rethinking care in the face of changing household constellations

Dr. Marie-Kristin Döbler, Institute for sociology, University of Tübingen
Prof. Dr. Marion Müller, Institute for sociology, University of Tübingen

Changes to the degree or nature of care have the potential to shape life courses as the transition into parenthood depicts vividly: a child’s birth comes with quite fundamental care responsibilities. However, it not only entails effects on parents’ present day, e.g. the organisation of (everyday) life and the current division of gainful employment and care work. Instead, it seems to set the course for future developments, decisions and options. Despite processes of emancipation and fights for equality, care arrangements and their long-term effects still seem to be highly gendered: the majority of (private) care in families is still performed by women. Thus, the transition to parenthood appears to involve different implications for mothers and fathers. What does that mean for subsequent transitions in the family life-cycle? 

With a focus on the dissolution of domestic family communities due to children’s departure or parents’ separation, we would like to discuss these and related questions:

  • What are the effects of divisions of care and paid employment set on track when a child is born for later family biographical transitions, primarily when entering the so-called empty nest or in the face of parental separation?
  • How does the experience of changing forms and intensities of care relate to care given or received previously? 
  • In which ways do heterosexual parents’ experiences of care differ across family life courses and how do parents explain these (gender) differences? 
  • What roles do age differences play in parental couples or the experience of one’s own ageing?
  • What kind of political, administrative, infrastructural or discursive influences are acknowledged by parents or can be reconstructed from an observer’s point of view?
  • In which ways do social contexts (political, religious and economic systems, institutional infrastructures, expectations and ideals about family life etc.) frame (re)negotiations about care arrangements on a personal basis (e.g. within couples, families) and the experiences of care? 

We welcome qualitative and quantitative research that address aforementioned questions.

Thematic Panel 2 – (Out of) Care in Crisis – Analyses and activist initiatives in the post-pandemic period

Convenors – Marjorie Griffin Cohen and Barbara Thiessen for the group Workshop on Care Initiatives (with participants from Canada, USA, Australia & Europe)

This call for papers is for a session that intends to deal with care issues as they are understood and addressed by initiatives or activist groups in different areas. 

The pandemic exposed serious deficiencies in existing care systems, and created new problems, neither of which receive the attention needed in the post-pandemic period. The ‘never again’ that was often expressed as horrors in care were exposed, now seems forgotten. In too many areas, the post-pandemic period continues with many of the same flawed policies of the pre-pandemic period. 

We are looking for papers that examine the following with reference to the activities of care groups: 

  • Identify care crises in distinct settings, such as different types of welfare systems, political structures and other aspects that act as a conditioning framework for post-pandemic periods. 
  • Examine what makes the post-pandemic period problematic, particularly in light of political changes such as the rise of the ultra-right, the focus on inflation and restrictive budget measures, and aggressive moves to privatize the provision of care. 
  • What specific innovative group initiatives are coming out of the pandemic period? What is the focus, and how are people effectively able to work together. What has been the experience with manifestos and care statements? 

The aim of this workshop is to share information to see how can we learn from each other, what are our similarities and differences, relating to different welfare state traditions and what are effective tactics and strategies that work across boundaries.

We welcome proposals and would especially like to encourage people from other areas and groups to join this thematic panel.

Symposia

The Transforming Care Conferences Symposia are parallel sessions focussing on a particular and topical theme.

Each Symposium is organized by a Symposium Chair and includes up to four identified paper authors who will present their papers during the session. One or more Discussants will comment on the papers.

Papers must be uploaded by 1st June, details to follow.

2023 Symposia:

  1. The political economy of care for children and older adults in times of crisis
  2. Breaking boundaries: international accounts from innovative ‘centres of excellence’ in social care
  3. Possibilities for care convoys: imaginative and diverse conversations
  4. Negotiating care in the context of multiple commitments: Combining paid work and informal care across the life span
  5. Socio-economic inequality in long term care and wellbeing: an overview of the findings of the IN-CARE project
  6. Young people’s gendered caring: crossing boundaries, shaping futures
  7. Blurring the boundaries of care: community-based public policies, social economy and commoning care practices. Insights from the Spanish case
  8. Gender Equality and Unpaid Care in the Pandemic: Opportunities for Transformation
  9. Crisis of the Later Life Care: Cases from Nordic Welfare States
  10. Institutional Boundaries and Wages in Care Employment
  11. Transnational families in Europe: caring during the time of ‘crisis’ of the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond

Meet the Author Session

Family Care of Older Persons in Southern Africa: ‘Care Crisis’ or ‘Care in contexts of crises’?
Associate Professor Elena Moore, Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Meet the Author: Family Care of Older Persons in Southern Africa: ‘Care Crisis’ or ‘Care in contexts of crises’?

Convenor: Associate Professor Elena Moore, Department of Sociology, University of Cape Town, South Africa

The context for long term care of older persons across countries in Southern Africa includes many overlapping and reoccuring crises including poverty, HIV-AIDs (and now Covid-19), food insecurity and several natural disasters. Despite the overwhelming contexts of ongoing crises, much of the policy and some scholarly attention has focused attention on the role of families, attempting to talk about a care crisis in terms of the weakening of traditional family support rather than the entrenched structural inequities in care provision. This symposium draws attention to the familialist policies in the region that focus on normative expectations that people are supported by their families and ignore the contexts of crisis in which care takes place. We call for more complex and nuanced understandings of the ways in which families care in contexts of deepening economic, political and health crises where rising acute illness amongst the elderly and post-independent economic and social policies have increased the demands on carers and families.

Symposium 11: Transnational families in Europe: caring during the time of ‘crisis’ of the Covid-19 pandemic and beyond

Convenors:

Dr Rosa Mas Giralt (Deputy Programme Manager BA Professional Studies, Lifelong Learning Centre, Visiting Research Associate, School of Geography, University of Leeds)

Prof Virginie Baby-Collin (Professor of Geography, INSPÉ, member of the joint research unit TELEMMe, University of Aix-Marseille)

Discussant: Dr Erika Kispeter (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)

Paying heed to the ‘Boundaries, Transitions and Crisis Contexts’ theme of the conference, this symposium will focus on the time of ‘crisis’ of the COVID-19 pandemic and how this has impacted ‘proximate’ and ‘distant’ caring responsibilities between younger, middle and older generations in transnational families in Europe. It will draw from the ongoing interdisciplinary and comparative research project Transnational Families in Europe: Care, Inequalities and Wellbeing taking place in France, Spain, Sweden and the UK. The project has adopted a multi-sited, family-focused, ethnographic and participatory action methodology. Each national team is working with third-sector partner organisations and community peer researchers to collect data from a diverse sample (i.e. different cultural backgrounds and legal statuses) of transnational families with care needs, including family members in countries of origin/other settlement countries (approx. 100 families overall plus 25 in-depth ethnographic family case studies). In addition, interviews with policymakers and practitioners working with migrants in health and social care, education, language learning, voluntary and community sector are also taking place across the four project countries (approx.65). 

The four paper presentations will consider the project’s emerging findings on the reconfiguration of care practices and arrangements in transnational families during, and, in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic in each project country. They will explore the challenges that younger, adult or older migrants or family members faced to continue to provide care locally or cross-borders, access temporary support schemes (e.g. furlough) and health and social services, or secure or maintain the legal status of different family members (e.g. IT or language barriers). Taking account of the boundary factors that mediate care provisions in different (trans)national contexts (i.e. migration regimes/migrants’ social rights) and intersecting inequalities within families (i.e. gender, age, disability, etc.), the symposium will illuminate temporary or more permanent changes in the intergenerational caring responsibilities and mobility strategies of transnational families in Europe in the (post)Covid-19 era.

Paper Authors

UK: Rosa Mas Giralt and Amrita Limbu (University of Leeds); Ruth Evans, Grady Walker, Sally Lloyd-Evans, and Tony Capstick (University of Reading); and James Simpson (Hong Kong University of Science & Technology). 

France: Polina Palash and Virginie Baby-Collin (University of Aix-Marseille). 

Spain: Raquel Martínez Buján, María Paloma Moré Corral, Laura Oso, Andrea Souto García, Laura Suárez Grimalt (University of Coruña, UDC) 

Sweden: Brigitte Suter, Katarina Mozetic (Malmö University). 

Symposium 10: Institutional Boundaries and Wages in Care Employment

Convenors: Franziska Dorn, University of Göttingen, Germany and Nancy Folbre, University of Massachusetts Amherst, US

A growing literature documents a clear “care penalty” on the wages of both women and men employed in care industries and occupations, controlling for individual characteristics. and other factors. Because women are highly concentrated in care jobs, their average earnings are significantly affected.  Other institutional factors also appear relevant, such as national policies, unionization, immigration status, and employment in public sector or a non-profit enterprises relative to for-profit businesses.  

This session will bring together international researchers who are exploring these issues in order to promote greater communication, interaction and collaboration. It includes participants from the U.S., U.K., Canada, and Germany who will consider implications for other countries. Brief presentations will be followed by panel discussion. 

Presentations: 

Torsten Müller, (European Trade Union Institute, Germany) “Trade Union Strategies to Tackle Low Pay in the Care Sector”

Naomi LightmanUniversity of Calgary, Canada, “Comparing Care Regimes: Worker Characteristics and Wage Penalties in the Global Care Chain” 

Damian Grimshaw (King’s College, London, UK), Mathew Johnson, Eva Herman, Jill Rubery (University of Manchester, UK), “Challenges and Contradictions Implementing a Real Living Wage in the UK Care Sector.”

Hussein, Shereen (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK ) “Employment Inequalities among British Minority Ethnic Workers in Health and Social Care at the time of COVID-19,”

Leila Gautham, (University of Leeds, UK), Kristin Smith (Dartmouth University, US), and Nancy Folbre (University of Massachusetts Amherst, US), “The Cost of Doing Good: The Relative Wages of Human Service Workers in the U.S.” 

Symposium 9: Crisis of the Later Life Care: Cases from Nordic Welfare States

Convenor: Alexandra Jønsson, Roskilde University

Despite being internationally known as affluent welfare states with well-functioning health and social services, Nordic countries face a crisis of care. This care-crisis is due to a rising number of elderly citizens in need of care and failure in recruitment in contexts marked by decades of austerity politics. This session explores the various strategies, practices and dilemmas related to the care-crisis. Taking onset in cases from Nordic Welfare States, the panel aims for a broader discussion applicable to various national and cultural settings. Nordic Welfare States, however, serve as a great example, because here governments have launched several strategies intended to re-organize and improve later-life care, focusing on issues such as better conditions for care workers, de-bureaucratization, digitalization of care, and sustainability. The panel investigate empirically the ‘problematizations’ of current conceptions of aging, care, care work and the organization of care embedded in the new policies and strategies, to discuss how the intention to solve the current crisis may constitute new problems and dilemmas: 

(1)“Care Crises: Problems & solutions” uses the case of an intervention to better health and care among and for migrants to discuss the problematization of migratory aging, and the failure to adapt local health intervention solutions to aging migrants. 

(2)“Attractive workplaces – a strategy to curb the recruitment crises” analyses attempts to introduce new care ideals, and reorganize care work that opposes principles of NPM in order to overcome the crisis of recruiting and retaining care workers. 

(3)“Datafication for care in later life?” identify the forms of care that are made to matter in processes of digitalization and data generation and the forms of care that escapes datafication and discuss how such practices relates to dominant notions to what is considered as ‘accountable care’. 

(4) “Sustainability for care in later life?” attends to medicalization and overuse in a sustainability perspective to discuss the drain of scarce care resources and the allocation of professional care for older people in the years to come. 

Presenters: 

Care Crises: Problems & solutions: Associate Professor Anne Leonora Blåkilde & Professor Karen Christensen

Attractive workplaces – a strategy to curb the recruitment crises: PhD candidate Maria Hjortsø Pedersen, Associate Professor Agnete Meldsgaard Hansen & Prof. Annette Kamp

Datafication for care in later life?: PhD candidate Mie Winther Christensen & Professor, Nete Schwennesen

Sustainability of later life care: Associate Professor, Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson 

Discussant: TBA